MRI offers three fundamental advantages
in osteoarthritis:
- Tomographic viewing perspective.
- Facilitates dimensional measurements by eliminating magnification and morphological distortion caused by projectional radiography
- Increases sensitivity for detecting bone erosions by eliminating superimposition of overlapping structures, which can obscure abnormalities on radiographs
- Unparalleled tissue contrast.
- Allows direct visualization of marrow edema / inflammation, menisci synovial tissue and effusion,articular cartilage, tendons and ligaments, which cannot be seen with X-rays. This makes whole-organ assessment of the joint possible.
- Allows assessment of compositional (collagen, proteoglycan, water) and physiological (vascular perfusion) features in addition to morphology
- Digital image format.
- Compared to hard copy films, electronic images offer safer and more economical archival, rapid recovery and distribution to multiple readers, computer aided analysis and facilitated regulatory submission and auditing
These advantages can be leveraged in clinical trials of osteoarthritis to extend the scope of structural assessments and increase discriminative power so as to reduce the number of patients and study sites, and shorten measurement intervals required to demonstrate efficacy. This can reduce uncertainty and cost in drug development dramatically, and also potentially accelerate market entry and revenues realized over the patent life of a new drug. With over 9,000 MRI systems available worldwide (over 4,000 systems in the U.S. alone), MR image acquisition is no longer restricted to specialized research facilities, and can be supported in large multi-center and multi-national clinical trials. Recent technological innovations in this area promise to markedly decrease the cost and increase the versatility and convenience of this remarkable technology for osteoarthritis in the near future.
MRI is particularly useful for internal decision-making, as it can provide faster readouts in proof-of-concept, dose-selection and interval-selection studies than is possible with more conservative methods, which are required for pivotal therapeutic confirmatory studies seeking regulatory approval. Proper application of innovative methods in these early Phase II and III studies can shave several months off a drug development program.
Whole-Organ Evaluation in Osteoarthritis
The structural determinants of mechanical dysfunction and pain in arthritis are not well understood, but probably involve a multitude of interactive pathways. Accordingly, osteoarthritis is best modeled as a disease of organ failure. The current practice of monitoring only a few of these features (usually radiographic joint-space narrowing and osteophytes), provides only a keyhole view of the disease process and limits the utility of such assessments. A broader panel of imaging markers – i.e., a whole-organ evaluation -is needed to properly appraise structural integrity in osteoarthritis. MRI is uniquely suited to providing such a comprehensive assessment of joint status.
| |
|
 |
|
| |
|
Dr. Peterfy, co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of Synarc, was the first to develop whole-organ MRI scoring (WORMS) for the knee. WORMS combines semi-quantitative assessments of a total of 11 structural features, including the articular cartilage, subarticular marrow-edema, cysts and bone attrition in 8 different locations in the knee; osteophytes along 16 articular margins; the medial and lateral menisci; the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments; and the medial and lateral collateral ligaments. This whole-organ scoring method provides high inter-reader reproducibility and has been used to evaluate over 3000 knees in various clinical trials and epidemiological studies over the last several years.
SynaVu MRI Reading
System
Centralized analysis of serially acquired MRI examinations requires the use of a specialized workstation in order to deal with the enormous number of individual images produced in each examination. Using the SynaVu™ MR reading system, individual sections from serial MRI scans acquired at multiple imaging sites are stripped of identifying information, anatomically registered, and stacked in separate windows on the workstation monitor. Each window represent a serial time point in a single patient series. Images in adjacent windows are anatomically aligned and viewed side-by-side to maximize our readers’ ability to detect small changes.
 |
 |
|
The system allows the reader to scroll back and forth through
the anatomy in all the windows simultaneously or individually
in order to gain a 3D perspective of the joint destruction.
The SynaVu reading system also provides numerous tools
to aid in image analysis, including image windowing and
level adjustment, zoom and panning functions, and dimensional
measuring tools. Workstations are also provided with validated
electronic score sheets with reader sign-off and automatic
databasing of results.
The system is capable of more sophisticated image processing
and analyses as well, including multi-modality fusion (e.g.,
MRI and scintigraphy) to expand the scope of imaging evaluations;
spectral and temporal data fusion to facilitate longitudinal
assessments, and various image segmentation and parametric
mapping algorithms for quantitative analyses.
MRI of Articular Cartilage
MRI is unparalleled in its utility for delineating articular
cartilage morphology and composition, particularly in large
joints, such as the knee. In contrast to conventional radiography,
MRI is able to evaluate all the articular surfaces in a
joint not just those regions that are in direct contact,
as is the case for radiographic joint-space width measurements.
This allows MRI to disclose cartilage defects and thinning
in regions of the joint not visible with radiography and
gives MRI greater sensitivity to change. Using conventional
MRI techniques available in most clinical centers around
the world, high-quality images of the cartilage can be generated
within only a few minutes in a highly standardized fashion
and transferred to our facilities for centralized analysis.
Morphological defects in different regions cartilage can
be assessed by semi-quantitative scoring, and volume or
thickness changes can be quantified using specially designed
image processing and analysis software. Moreover, early
degeneration of the cartilage matrix can be detected before
morphological defects arise.
 |
 |
|
Synarc's founding scientists have pioneered
many of the MRI methods currently used to evaluate osteoarthritis
in clinical trials. Charles Peterfy, Medical Director of Musculoskeletal at Synarc, developed a 14-region, 14-point MRI cartilage
scoring method which has been used in more clinical trials
and epidemiological studies than any other method. Dr. Peterfy
was also the first to develop and validate a MRI method
for quantifying the volume of articular cartilage in the
knee and hands. Additionally, he developed the first whole-organ
MRI scoring method (WORMS) for the knee. These methods have
been used in more than 3,000 knee MRI examinations to date.
Longitudinal studies continue to provide information about
the validity and performance of these methods, but considerable
knowledge about how to implement these techniques in clinical
trials already exists.


MRI of Bone Changes
Osteophytes
Because of its tomographic viewing perspective, MRI can
delineate osteophytes in locations that are invisible on
x-ray radiographs of the knee as a result of projectional
superimposition. This increases the sensitivity of MRI for
this classic feature of osteoarthritis.

Bone Edema
One of the most intriguing potential MRI endpoints in osteoarthritis
is bone marrow edema-like change. Whether this feature represents
pulsion of joint fluid through breaks in the articular surface,
localized inflammation, or changes associated with trauma
(microfracture or osteonecrosis) due to biomechanical incompetence
of the articular surface is not known. However, since this
feature can change very rapidly (less than 3 months) and
correlates with pain and scintigraphic uptake of radiolabeled
bone tracers, it may represent a very useful predictive
imaging marker for patient selection and longitudinal assessment
of efficacy and safety of putative therapies for osteoarthritis,
particularly in studies aimed at internal decision making.
MRI of Synovitis
MRI is uniquely able to detect and quantify synovitis.
Most of the interest in this imaging endpoint has been focused
on rheumatoid arthritis. However, synovitis is frequently
present in osteoarthritis and has the valuable attribute
of rapid rate of change. Better understanding of how this
feature predicts other structural changes in osteoarthritis
and correlates with pain and other clinical outcomes would
therefore be useful. Quantitative MRI markers of synovitis
include the volume of synovial tissue and fluid and the
rate of synovial enhancement following intravenous injection
of contrast material.
MRI of the Menisci and Ligaments
MRI has been the clinical imaging method of choice for
evaluating the menisci, cruciate ligaments and collateral
ligaments in the knee for almost two decades, and there
is considerable knowledge about its diagnostic accuracy.
Integrating these articular elements into the whole-organ
assessment provides a richer picture of the structural integrity
of the joint.

|